Active Users:627 Time:18/03/2026 11:57:54 PM
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM
More to the matter, Davros had said that the Dalek form was the "final result of continued Kaled evolution" and he "hurried" that evolution. How any evolutionary result could be "final" is scientifically suspect, but the statement stands.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 557 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 590 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 512 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 441 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 414 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 541 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 409 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 536 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 406 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 420 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 432 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 518 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 375 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 209 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 431 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 434 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 425 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 412 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 427 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 404 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 488 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 406 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 468 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 507 Views

Reply to Message