Active Users:871 Time:23/06/2026 06:21:13 AM
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM
More to the matter, Davros had said that the Dalek form was the "final result of continued Kaled evolution" and he "hurried" that evolution. How any evolutionary result could be "final" is scientifically suspect, but the statement stands.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
so... Doctor Who? - 27/12/2009 10:36:29 AM 581 Views
I do enjoy John Simm *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 01:11:09 PM 621 Views
A good first part *spoilers* - 28/12/2009 02:23:56 PM 543 Views
Ooooh. - 28/12/2009 06:01:22 PM 466 Views
I liked it. - 28/12/2009 03:49:41 PM 444 Views
Technically, you're wrong about that. - 28/12/2009 07:44:35 PM 573 Views
Re: Technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 01:35:17 PM 446 Views
Supposedly they are humanoid. I always took that to mean - 29/12/2009 01:59:27 PM 562 Views
Timelords are also humanoid - 29/12/2009 02:34:32 PM 434 Views
But they have two hearts. Different evolutionary ladder. - 29/12/2009 05:16:46 PM 446 Views
For all we know the daleks have three. - 29/12/2009 05:50:15 PM 459 Views
No, that was Leela. - 29/12/2009 02:01:23 PM 555 Views
I knew it was one of them - 29/12/2009 02:16:48 PM 399 Views
Wikipedia swallows less time than the Weeping Angels, though. *NM* - 29/12/2009 03:24:09 PM 218 Views
This is true - 29/12/2009 03:40:15 PM 458 Views
Umm, technically, you're wrong about that. - 29/12/2009 05:37:10 PM 467 Views
Mnonono - 29/12/2009 05:51:10 PM 455 Views
Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:03:37 PM 446 Views
Re: Ok inside the dome. - 29/12/2009 06:06:04 PM 457 Views
Forced evolution is still evolution, yes. - 29/12/2009 06:46:48 PM 435 Views
No, I'm not. - 29/12/2009 06:47:30 PM 520 Views
It's the order things occured in wherein lies your error. - 30/12/2009 09:23:10 AM 438 Views
I enjoyed it enormously. - 29/12/2009 05:42:38 PM 496 Views
Interesting idea - 30/12/2009 07:54:31 PM 537 Views

Reply to Message