Active Users:588 Time:03/08/2025 10:43:02 PM
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM
But given the concept of infinity and endlessly cyclical time, I believe that this 'first' Age, when the Creator created everything, is not actually the first because in order to have infinite cycles, an infinite past had to be created along with an infinite future.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1405 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1007 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 774 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 887 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 850 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 813 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 745 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 358 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 720 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 772 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 800 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 729 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 896 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 784 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 719 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 758 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 752 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 742 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 814 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 750 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 763 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 386 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 722 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 365 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 412 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 796 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 705 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 736 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1052 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 748 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 852 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1193 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 774 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 765 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 812 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 886 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 847 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 768 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 719 Views

Reply to Message