Active Users:774 Time:15/12/2025 02:41:37 AM
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM
That's the point of the whole "...called the Third Age by some..." intro to the books. Their timeline is not a straight line - it may very well be the case in this universe that the seeds of the beginnings of certain elements of Ages to come are planted in small amounts in the past, so each succession of Ages build on one another.

In other words, there is no "beginning", but there are "beginnings". Hence, there is no FIRST Age, but there are Ages that are called "the First".

In other words, since the Creator and the Dark One exist outside of time, their activities in this universe are governed by the rules of a predestination paradox because they are simultaneously working in the past and the future.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 22/04/2010 at 10:12:54 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1504 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1095 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 847 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 987 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 976 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 915 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 828 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 402 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 805 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 852 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 876 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 809 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 976 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 864 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 819 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 826 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 847 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 833 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 933 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 838 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 837 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 430 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 809 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 419 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 460 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 872 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 785 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 821 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1126 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 841 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 944 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1306 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 893 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 841 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 895 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 959 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 954 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 864 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 795 Views

Reply to Message