Active Users:430 Time:03/05/2025 07:42:00 AM
Why? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM
But given the concept of infinity and endlessly cyclical time, I believe that this 'first' Age, when the Creator created everything, is not actually the first because in order to have infinite cycles, an infinite past had to be created along with an infinite future.


The 7 spoked Wheel is basically an image for a cosmic loom, which bit by bit creates the respective Pattern of each Age. There must have been a time, when the weaving of the Pattern started, after the Creator placed the Wheel, and thus there must have been a "first 1st Age", a "first 2nd Age", and so on.


Why do you assume it is impossible for the Creator to create infinite time going backward in time, but possible to create infinite time going forward?
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1363 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 968 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 738 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 853 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 818 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 781 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 712 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 343 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 687 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 738 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 769 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 696 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 860 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 744 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 685 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 726 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 717 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 707 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 777 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 716 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 729 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 370 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 686 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 340 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 397 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 759 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 668 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 699 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1013 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 713 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 817 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1144 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 735 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 733 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 778 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 849 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 787 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 739 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 685 Views

Reply to Message