Active Users:1620 Time:19/03/2026 09:34:04 AM
It's reversed... Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM
... what with the 'Master Underhill' joke. That a copy survived two to three Ages is unbelievable enough :P.


Tolkien used the name "Master Underhill", because he knew the WoT myth. ;)
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1574 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1147 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 906 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1038 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1030 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 968 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 876 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 419 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 860 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 919 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 942 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 857 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1039 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 921 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 871 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 879 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 893 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 891 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 987 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 883 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 892 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 451 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 878 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 458 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 481 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 924 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 836 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 892 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1183 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 899 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1004 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1364 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 953 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 912 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 951 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1014 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1012 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 923 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 856 Views

Reply to Message