Active Users:952 Time:06/08/2025 02:26:55 PM
I know... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM
That the majority of readers would agree with you that it's plausible that Graendal was there. But IMO it isn't, especially because we hardly knew anything about Graendal before LoC, except that she is a very obscene Forsaken. For example, Sammael would have been a more obvious candidate before LoC.

Also RJ's comment that the two servants Rand sees when he hunts Rahvin are in no way connected to the murder makes it rather unlikely to me that nonetheless Graendal was there to Compel any servants, unseen to the readers and that this is the reason for the murder.

Besides, if Graendal searched someone to use Complusion on to gather infos, it only makes sense to strike with heavy Compulsion on Asmo, abduct & interrogate and then kill him. This would be a perfect opportunity to Graendal to learn more about Rand & his plans. Like she tried in PoD with Cyndane & Moghedien.

As said, if balefire was used, it only makes sense that Graendal would use very weak balefire, but we know that in this case the DO can transmigrate the balefired person (but concerning Asmo, the DO couldn't).

It wasn't a big mystery, but I still think that RJ had a precise idea of what happened to Asmo. That a killer, who uses TAR, takes him there to die and get rid off his body, isn't such a complex thought. And that RJ indicated that he will most likely reveal it in the PoV of the killer speaks against Graendal as well because she is most likely dead and won't have another PoV.

It also makes sense to consider that the same killer, who already assassinated people associated to the Shadow twice before in the series, namely in the Stone of Tear and in Tar Valon, struck again in Caemlyn.
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1259 Views
It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 924 Views
Re: It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 888 Views
Well... - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 880 Views
A few points - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 671 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 748 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 740 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 720 Views
Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 793 Views
Re: Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 785 Views
I think... - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 704 Views
Re: I think... - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 646 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 331 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 672 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 300 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 698 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 310 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 660 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 716 Views
That doesn't make sense - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 683 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 624 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 689 Views
You confuse two things... - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 616 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 629 Views
I argue... - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 796 Views
we don't know any of that until WH - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 779 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 669 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 687 Views
Thanks! - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 668 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 728 Views
I think you are grasping a little - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 722 Views
Re: Well... - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 753 Views
I know... - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 721 Views
Re: I know... - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 604 Views
Re: I know... - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 768 Views
graendal - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 645 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 713 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 717 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 708 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 716 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 660 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 716 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 348 Views
I agree - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 950 Views

Reply to Message