Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
But we didn't know about the TP for a long time after Ishy's death. All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?
But of course we had clues concerning the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named yet.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1216 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
892 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
852 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
843 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
636 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
710 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
705 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
684 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
754 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
749 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
672 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
615 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
316 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
634 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
282 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
659 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
293 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
623 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
679 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
647 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
589 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
659 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
577 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
597 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
760 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
742 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
324 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
790 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
676 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
672 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
675 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
680 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
625 Views