Active Users:403 Time:18/06/2025 12:56:24 AM
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
But we didn't know about the TP for a long time after Ishy's death. All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?


But of course we had clues concerning the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named yet.


For your theory to be true the TP is intrinsic to Slayer being the killer. No True Power connection "anchoring" Ishamael to ST, no way Asmodean's soul was beyond the reach of ST.


It just explains why Asmo couldn't be brought back.
And as said, we knew about the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named "True Power" yet.


It's been made clear that the reason he can't be brought back was intrinsic to the WAY he was killed as well as the WHERE. Therefore it's completely relevant to who done it.

Given RJs statements about the way and place of Asmo's death, and the fact that all the pieces were there for us by LoC I find it impossible to come up with Slayer, with poison in TAR as the solution. Not to mention that the TP (or lack thereof) is the reason Asmo can't be retrieved.

1. We don't have any proof that Asmo's soul couldn't be reclaimed due to death in TAR

2. Even if we did have this proof AND the TP somehow counteracts it we have no way of knowing that the TP and the "black cables" were different things

3. We still don't have any clue if Asmodean would have known Slayer

4. Doesn't explain how RJ called Asmo's death as "one of opportunity" ... if Slayer did kill him you can't call it opportunistic since Slayer would have stalked him and killed him on his own terms ... that's what Assassins do!

Compare to Graendal as a suspect:

1. She's linked to BF almost from her first appearance ... Rahvin thinks to himself that he will flee if Lanfear and Graendal get into a duel and BF comes out.

2. She's openly threatened to kill other FS a number of times

3. She's got reasons to go to Caemlyn after Rahvin's death and the Pantry is an excellent place to find future spies as DomA described above.

4. She doesn't know Asmo is shielded so a quick BF death would be logical in a moment of surprise. As opposed to the Moghedien/Cyndane scene she when she was far more prepared.

5. We know for fact that Asmo would recognize her.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1238 Views
It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 907 Views
Re: It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 870 Views
Well... - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 860 Views
A few points - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 652 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 728 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 720 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 701 Views
Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 770 Views
Re: Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 767 Views
I think... - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 688 Views
Re: I think... - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 630 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 324 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 653 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 292 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 679 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 303 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 643 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 695 Views
That doesn't make sense - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 665 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 607 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 674 Views
You confuse two things... - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 597 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 613 Views
I argue... - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 778 Views
we don't know any of that until WH - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 756 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 651 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 672 Views
Thanks! - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 648 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 712 Views
I think you are grasping a little - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 709 Views
Re: Well... - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 740 Views
I know... - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 703 Views
Re: I know... - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 586 Views
Re: I know... - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 749 Views
graendal - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 628 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 691 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 697 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 691 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 698 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 642 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 698 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 339 Views
I agree - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 930 Views

Reply to Message