Active Users:508 Time:30/09/2025 10:55:17 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But your theory completely relies on this thought darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
RJ just said that it is intuitively obvious who killed Asmo. The how and where was just to explain why Asmo wasn't transmigrated. Nothing says that the explanation to this is as obvious as the identity of the killer. However, one has to find a solution to explain that these factors fit to your killer. IMO, the "weak balefire used by Graendal not at SG"-explanation doesn't really work, contrary to Slayer killing Asmo in a way that he is already mortally wounded/defenseless in Caemlyn and then just taken to TAR to give his last breath.


I'm not confusing the two points, it's just that if you want your theory to hold water, all the elements that go into it MUST be "intuitively obvious" at the time of Asmo's death. The manner and place of his death are an important clue to the identity of Asmo's killer.

Regardless of this point, I still say the scene itself refutes your accounting of Asmo's death and certainly the way you describe this is not intuitively obvious. Why would the reader have any reason to think Asmo died in TAR? We don't even know how Slayer enters TAR at this time in the series as his scenes in the Two Rivers make if vague, even after his wounding he goes back to where his body was last seen before he reappears.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. Tom - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1280 Views
It's unlikely Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 946 Views
Re: It's unlikely DomA - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 915 Views
Well... Etzel - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 896 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 694 Views
Re: A few points Etzel - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 772 Views
Re: A few points darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 759 Views
Re: A few points DomA - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 745 Views
Actually I believe... Etzel - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 811 Views
Re: Actually I believe... darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 801 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 726 Views
Re: I think... darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 665 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 344 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 696 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 309 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 719 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* Etzel - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 320 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 676 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 731 Views
That doesn't make sense darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 694 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. Etzel - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 638 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 713 Views
You confuse two things... Etzel - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 636 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 651 Views
I argue... Etzel - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 817 Views
we don't know any of that until WH darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 801 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... Etzel - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 684 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... darius_sedai - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 707 Views
Thanks! darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 689 Views
Re: A few points Etzel - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 751 Views
I think you are grasping a little darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 758 Views
Re: Well... DomA - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 778 Views
I know... Etzel - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 749 Views
Re: I know... DomA - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 628 Views
Re: I know... Etzel - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 793 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM 353 Views
graendal Foxhead - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 663 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others... DomA - 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM 859 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 729 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick darius_sedai - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 737 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 729 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick DomA - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 740 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) RugbyPlayingAshaman - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 681 Views
Re: I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien DomA - 26/05/2010 02:24:44 PM 807 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think newyorkersedai - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 732 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* aldapelan - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 354 Views
I agree Camilla - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 970 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes