"All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?"
It's interesting that you are allowed to take the main clues from LoC, though.
Anyway, we had this discussion often enough and I doubt we will find a consensus. Let us just wait & see!
It's interesting that you are allowed to take the main clues from LoC, though.
Anyway, we had this discussion often enough and I doubt we will find a consensus. Let us just wait & see!
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1433 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1050 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1060 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1017 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
821 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
904 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
871 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
849 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
919 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
902 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
825 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
780 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
387 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
806 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
352 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
846 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
362 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
773 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
824 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
791 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
738 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
836 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
731 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
749 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
921 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
918 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above...
- 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM
780 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
407 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
989 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
846 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
833 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
829 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
851 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
786 Views