Active Users:355 Time:30/04/2025 01:30:00 PM
could be nigelgoboom Send a noteboard - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM
Your suggestion isn't really a way to beat the Oath Rod . BS's answer indicates that Mesaana in her AS disguise (IMO, most likely the White Norine Dovarna) seemingly took the Oaths, but actually found a technical way to prevent that the Oath Rod works as it should.

Personally, I think it makes some sense that Mesaana prevented that the Oath Rod touched her skin, e.g. by an invisible and inverted OP barrier around her hand or something like that. Thus, the Oath Rod couldn't work as it should.


being not only an AoL AS but also an academic of the time she very likely knew the principles of the binding weave itself and therefore could have come up with several ways to beat the weave itself. whether gloves of air or just a specific type of warding, inverted of course.

but it doesn't have to be that complicated. whether egwene asked if they were df's or even ba, from mesaana's perspective she's neither. she's a "CHOSEN", or a "TRUE" aes sedai, or maybe even a "god" like graendal seemed to suggest.

the simple question of "do you serve the DO" might not even work if mesaana merely has to "decide" on the spot not to and then claim not to serve the DO. the better question to put them too would be "have you ever served the DO" or "have you ever considered yourself one of the chosen"

or how about "what was the name of the city were you born at the time of your birth?". that would work too, for the forsaken at least. hehe

cheers



Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3741 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1013 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 898 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 983 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1245 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 943 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 925 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 970 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 522 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 946 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 938 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 856 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 773 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 800 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1068 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 834 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 817 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 794 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 952 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 979 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 877 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 855 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 808 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 864 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 901 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 748 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1024 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 744 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 883 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 820 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 894 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 827 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 435 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 711 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 887 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 789 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 965 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 761 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 814 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 913 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 799 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1240 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 832 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 803 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 822 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1177 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 807 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 892 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 730 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 741 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 677 Views

Reply to Message