Active Users:417 Time:18/09/2025 04:15:29 PM
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM
I think Brandon hinted that there is a way to defeat the Rod itself, not the whole Aes Sedai process around taking the Oath.

For some months now I have the following theory:
- to swear the Oath again, the Aes Sedai are un-swearing them;
- since Mesaana didn't swear any Oath, we actually don't know what happens when you are un-swearing them while never swearing in the first place;
- my theory is that such process creates a Oath-negative effect for the channeler, and when the channeler actually swears the Oath, its effect is cancelled by the Oath-negative effect;
- this may actually be tied to the physics of the Rod and so Brandon's words hold true.


However, Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones. She had oathes to the DO and as shown by the BA hunters the OR cancels those. I don't recall if the "unswearing" was ever fully depicted in the novels but I think it would be a simple "I forswear all oathes previously made"


No Forsaken took any Oath on the Rod. In fact, any regular Darkfriend never took any Oath. Except Black Ajah of course.

Black Ajah had access to the Rod and they NEED to look ageless, so, thus, the Black Ajah Oaths.
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3840 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1070 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 947 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1032 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1321 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1003 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1007 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1029 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 544 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1001 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 985 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 915 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 834 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 862 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1134 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 888 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 873 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 846 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1004 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1049 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 932 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 913 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 866 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 917 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 952 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 801 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1108 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 797 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 957 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 879 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 955 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 879 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 459 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 763 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 943 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 848 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1016 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 813 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 872 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 966 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 859 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1300 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 880 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 882 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 875 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1233 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 856 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 942 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 787 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 789 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 762 Views

Reply to Message