Active Users:467 Time:14/12/2025 10:52:32 PM
I think this won't work for one reason. Logain Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM
The Binders work on channelers by using their connection to the Source to lay down the Compulsion. This is why it is not only symbolic but necessary for there to be one channeler to operate the Binder and another channeler to agree to be Bound. This is also why Binders do not work on non-channeling criminals, with other ter'angreal, such as the Chair of Remorse, or a Compulsion weave, being used for such purposes.

If Mesaana was in a Link, the Compulsion might very well be negated because her access to the Power was being provided from other connections.

In this case, by the time Egwene had ordered that every Aes Sedai re-swear the Oaths, we were told that all the Black Ajah members had fled, and only a few were captured in comparison to the amount captured in the Rebel camp. It seems to me that this piece of information is very important, because it indicated not only that the Black Ajah figured out what Egwene was going to do, but also they had time to coordinate and plan.

Perhaps Mesaana ordered one or more Black Ajah Sisters into a Link and by this, she escaped being bound because Compulsion would not work on a channeler that was Linked with others?

An example would be a Shield. A Shield usually doesn't work when wielded by one channeler against a Circle because the Shielder would need to be strong enough to cut off all the members of the Circle at once, which is hard to do (in fact, we've never seen this happen - all we've seen was Rand attack a Shield that had held him by destroying tied off points). Perhaps Compulsion works the same way.

We also know that the distance a channeler can Travel before their Link beings to attenuate and weaken is quite considerable - the Black Ajah Aes Sedai could have been hundreds of miles away from Tar Valon and still contribute to Mesaana's Circle.

Strengthening piece of trivia: We are also told that holding the Power gives you increased protection from Compulsion. If you were to increase your power level by a significant amount, you could make yourself immune to another channelers' Compulsion weave unless they themselves used a Circle, angreal or sa'angreal to significantly boost the strength of their weave. By Linking to 12 other Black Ajah Sisters and keeping the amount of Power she held negligible enough to pass, Mesaana might have made herself too powerful to be Bound by all but the strongest Aes Sedai currently living in a Circle directed against her.


Mesaana would need to be the leader of the circle. If she ever let the power go the shield would disappear and her protection with it. Thus, she would have to enter the room with the glow around her, never let go of the power, take the oaths (or appear to take them) and then leave the room still enveloped by the glow around her.

Maybe there is a tricky way of inverting weaves to make it look like she wasn't holding the power when she entered the room, then letting the inverted wwave dissipate to make it look like she was now holding the power, then swearing the oaths, and then reapplying the inverted weave to make it look like she had let go of saidar, or even letting the circle dissipate after that point. That seems like it might work, but seems like a big risk. I mean, what if her ruse doesn't work and she gets captured. Then what?
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3899 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1104 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 977 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1082 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1381 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1033 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1044 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1082 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 561 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1043 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 1019 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 952 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 870 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 893 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1175 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 926 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 906 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 882 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1042 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1104 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 963 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 948 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 892 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 954 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 990 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 838 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1143 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 834 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 993 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 916 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 985 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 939 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 473 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 799 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 991 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 905 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1069 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 846 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 905 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 1019 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 901 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1351 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 938 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 938 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 922 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1287 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 889 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 975 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 825 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 817 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 804 Views

Reply to Message