Active Users:382 Time:01/05/2025 06:58:12 AM
I agree, but... LoialT Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM

We don't know that's how the binder works. It's most likely it doesn't work like that. There's a binder for channelers and a binder for non-channelers and personally I think it has to do with physical differences, namely that channelers have different brains, or at least, their minds become altered when they're teenagers and exposed to the Source for the first time.

You don't even need to hold the Source to be bound... someone else can channel Spirit into the rod, so long as you touch it. A link would be just as useless, and even worse, the Sisters around would definitely notice. Mesaana would never trust her fate to the treacherous Black Ajah anyway... Liandrin was a murderous sneak at the best of times around Moghedien.


I don't think it is really about different brains as much as it is the same vulnerability that allows 1. The a'dam / The Domination Band; 2. Linking; 3. 13/13 Circle turning to the Dark. That is, I think the ability to channel allows one's spirit/mind to be opened to (and therefore vulnerable to) possession by outside spiritual forces (whether it is merging or domination produced by a direct link) or the possibility of being turned to the dark. This is not the same as rewiring the brain like in compulsion, which works equally well on channelers and non-channelers despite their "different brains." Rather, the Binders, a'dam, and 13/13 Circles all work around linking abilities. You also don't need to embrace the Source to be bound by an a'dam or controlled by a domination band and presumably the 13/13 circles wouldn't work if one only had to resist touching the Source to escape its powers. I also believe that the Warder bonds work more like a link and like the OR. This is another bond/binding that can be used to control others. Just look at Logain's control over the AS he bonded. It is absolute like the OR, not a matter of controlling consciousness like compulsion.
This message last edited by LoialT on 20/07/2010 at 08:20:55 PM
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3745 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1017 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 900 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 984 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1248 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 947 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 929 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 970 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 523 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 949 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 938 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 857 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 778 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 805 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1070 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 837 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 822 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 795 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 955 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 983 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 879 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 857 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 813 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 866 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 906 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 750 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1028 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 745 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 884 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 822 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 898 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 830 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 436 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 715 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 892 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 790 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 966 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 764 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 819 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 917 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 802 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1246 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 836 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 805 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 826 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1182 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 808 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 893 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 732 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 743 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 681 Views

Reply to Message