Active Users:326 Time:17/06/2025 04:28:57 PM
I agree, but... LoialT Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM

We don't know that's how the binder works. It's most likely it doesn't work like that. There's a binder for channelers and a binder for non-channelers and personally I think it has to do with physical differences, namely that channelers have different brains, or at least, their minds become altered when they're teenagers and exposed to the Source for the first time.

You don't even need to hold the Source to be bound... someone else can channel Spirit into the rod, so long as you touch it. A link would be just as useless, and even worse, the Sisters around would definitely notice. Mesaana would never trust her fate to the treacherous Black Ajah anyway... Liandrin was a murderous sneak at the best of times around Moghedien.


I don't think it is really about different brains as much as it is the same vulnerability that allows 1. The a'dam / The Domination Band; 2. Linking; 3. 13/13 Circle turning to the Dark. That is, I think the ability to channel allows one's spirit/mind to be opened to (and therefore vulnerable to) possession by outside spiritual forces (whether it is merging or domination produced by a direct link) or the possibility of being turned to the dark. This is not the same as rewiring the brain like in compulsion, which works equally well on channelers and non-channelers despite their "different brains." Rather, the Binders, a'dam, and 13/13 Circles all work around linking abilities. You also don't need to embrace the Source to be bound by an a'dam or controlled by a domination band and presumably the 13/13 circles wouldn't work if one only had to resist touching the Source to escape its powers. I also believe that the Warder bonds work more like a link and like the OR. This is another bond/binding that can be used to control others. Just look at Logain's control over the AS he bonded. It is absolute like the OR, not a matter of controlling consciousness like compulsion.
This message last edited by LoialT on 20/07/2010 at 08:20:55 PM
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3775 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1035 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 916 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1000 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1266 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 962 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 947 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 987 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 530 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 965 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 955 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 877 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 794 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 820 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1089 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 851 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 837 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 810 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 975 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1013 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 897 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 876 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 828 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 881 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 923 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 764 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1044 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 760 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 920 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 838 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 914 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 849 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 442 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 729 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 907 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 809 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 985 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 778 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 835 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 931 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 819 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1265 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 849 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 824 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 839 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1195 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 825 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 908 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 749 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 757 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 697 Views

Reply to Message