Active Users:829 Time:17/02/2026 03:16:04 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM

Both had separated PoV
How is that a problem or proof that the Nae'blis isn't a Slayer-like construct between a fade and a human? I'm sure you're familiar with the Isam PoV in WH. How does that disprove Slayer?

It doesn't.


We precisely learn in Isam's/Luc's PoV that both the same being. That is contrary to the PoV of SH and Moridin, which imply that both are separate beings.

So how do different PoV's disprove that Moridin and Shaidar Haran are the same "24/7 creature" like Slayer is?

it doesn't.


... in various answers RJ & BS made clear that both are independent characters.
Show me. And I'll try to prove you wrong.


RJ and BS distinguish in various Q&A (can be found at Theoryland, for example) between SH, who basically is the DO, and Moridin, who is a Forsaken. On the other hand, it's made clear in the books and in Q&A that Isam and Luc form one being.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1883 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1263 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1149 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 1093 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 956 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1156 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 1019 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1271 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1105 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1414 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1133 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1263 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1077 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1171 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1178 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1105 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1194 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1042 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1417 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1415 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1022 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1125 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1109 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1053 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1088 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 982 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 944 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1044 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1062 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1160 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1006 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1128 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1086 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1144 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1044 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 570 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1201 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1045 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1115 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1059 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1005 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 918 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1153 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1042 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 916 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 934 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 965 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 983 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1051 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1073 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 885 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1099 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 998 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 907 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1145 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1017 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 946 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1204 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes