Active Users:460 Time:09/04/2026 03:56:27 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM

Both had separated PoV
How is that a problem or proof that the Nae'blis isn't a Slayer-like construct between a fade and a human? I'm sure you're familiar with the Isam PoV in WH. How does that disprove Slayer?

It doesn't.


We precisely learn in Isam's/Luc's PoV that both the same being. That is contrary to the PoV of SH and Moridin, which imply that both are separate beings.

So how do different PoV's disprove that Moridin and Shaidar Haran are the same "24/7 creature" like Slayer is?

it doesn't.


... in various answers RJ & BS made clear that both are independent characters.
Show me. And I'll try to prove you wrong.


RJ and BS distinguish in various Q&A (can be found at Theoryland, for example) between SH, who basically is the DO, and Moridin, who is a Forsaken. On the other hand, it's made clear in the books and in Q&A that Isam and Luc form one being.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1900 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1289 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1182 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 1117 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 977 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1185 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 1036 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1297 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1129 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1454 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1154 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1302 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1111 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1194 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1208 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1132 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1218 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1064 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1449 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1440 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1045 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1154 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1136 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1079 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1109 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1011 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 962 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1069 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1086 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1182 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1018 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1153 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1114 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1160 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1072 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 580 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1222 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1070 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1139 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1087 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1029 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 948 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1191 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1066 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 947 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 962 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 986 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1012 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1078 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1097 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 909 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1130 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1022 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 930 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1173 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1043 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 978 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1228 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes