Active Users:391 Time:18/06/2025 08:07:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM

Both had separated PoV
How is that a problem or proof that the Nae'blis isn't a Slayer-like construct between a fade and a human? I'm sure you're familiar with the Isam PoV in WH. How does that disprove Slayer?

It doesn't.


We precisely learn in Isam's/Luc's PoV that both the same being. That is contrary to the PoV of SH and Moridin, which imply that both are separate beings.

So how do different PoV's disprove that Moridin and Shaidar Haran are the same "24/7 creature" like Slayer is?

it doesn't.


... in various answers RJ & BS made clear that both are independent characters.
Show me. And I'll try to prove you wrong.


RJ and BS distinguish in various Q&A (can be found at Theoryland, for example) between SH, who basically is the DO, and Moridin, who is a Forsaken. On the other hand, it's made clear in the books and in Q&A that Isam and Luc form one being.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1695 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1088 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 984 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 942 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 784 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1009 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 887 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1091 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 938 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1242 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 989 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1098 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 918 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 979 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 988 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 934 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1036 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 892 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1226 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1256 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 856 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 954 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 951 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 898 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 959 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 818 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 777 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 885 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 899 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1000 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 838 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 993 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 928 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 978 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 884 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 480 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1049 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 894 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 964 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 930 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 829 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 781 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 999 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 878 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 771 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 778 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 807 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 831 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 874 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 917 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 723 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 964 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 847 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 776 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1011 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 856 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 747 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1036 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes