Active Users:884 Time:17/02/2026 01:19:45 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM
1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.

You think RJ just went out of his way to hide this in his books for kicks, eh?

- My answer: The killing stopped temporarily because Ishamael was linked to SHv0,5.


Really? The most trusted Forsaken was used as a simple hitman to motivate an only somewhat important Darkfriend?
I don't know Gher, but the fact still remains;
When Ishamael dies, the killings stop for two months. And after those months, they are picked up again. I don't have any more specifics. I'd have thought this was enough.

God knows, it was hard enough connecting all the dots. (combining timelines & all Carridin's remarks)

I could reverse the question; why else did it stop? You tell me. Give me an answer that comes from the books..?
There isn't one (and believe me, I've looked)

That doesn't remove the hint though.
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'

Death dances in my footsteps....
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1883 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1262 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1149 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 1091 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 954 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1155 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 1019 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1270 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1105 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1414 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1133 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1263 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1075 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1170 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1177 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1104 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1194 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1042 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1417 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1415 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1021 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1123 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1107 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1052 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1087 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 981 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 942 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1042 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1061 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1159 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1006 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1127 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1085 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1143 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1043 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 570 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1200 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1045 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1113 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1057 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1005 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 916 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1151 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1041 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 916 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 933 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 963 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 982 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1051 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1073 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 885 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1099 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 998 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 907 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1144 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1015 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 945 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1203 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes