Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
Mik Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM
1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.
You think RJ just went out of his way to hide this in his books for kicks, eh?
- My answer: The killing stopped temporarily because Ishamael was linked to SHv0,5.
You think RJ just went out of his way to hide this in his books for kicks, eh?
- My answer: The killing stopped temporarily because Ishamael was linked to SHv0,5.
Really? The most trusted Forsaken was used as a simple hitman to motivate an only somewhat important Darkfriend?
When Ishamael dies, the killings stop for two months. And after those months, they are picked up again. I don't have any more specifics. I'd have thought this was enough.
God knows, it was hard enough connecting all the dots. (combining timelines & all Carridin's remarks)
I could reverse the question; why else did it stop? You tell me. Give me an answer that comes from the books..?
There isn't one (and believe me, I've looked)
That doesn't remove the hint though.
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'
Death dances in my footsteps....
Death dances in my footsteps....
Moridin & Shadar Haran
- 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
1902 Views
No...
- 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
1291 Views
Re: No...
- 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
1182 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
1119 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
979 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
- 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
1188 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
- 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
1037 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
- 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
1454 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
- 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
1154 Views
Au contraire.
- 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
1303 Views
But why...
- 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
1113 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
- 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
1208 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
- 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
1134 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
- 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
1218 Views
Um not quite
- 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
1065 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
- 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
1047 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
1156 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1138 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
1081 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
1112 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
1013 Views
The problem is...
- 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
962 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
- 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
1070 Views
I already answered all this...
- 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
1088 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
- 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
1184 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
- 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
1115 Views
No problem
- 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
1162 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
- 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
1222 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
- 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
1070 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
- 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
1141 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
- 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
1087 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
1068 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
947 Views
One should also remember...
- 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
986 Views
Eh?
- 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
1014 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
- 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
1078 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
- 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
1097 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM
1131 Views

*NM*
=
- Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela?