Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.
In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.
I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.
I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Moridin & Shadar Haran
- 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
2033 Views
No...
- 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
1422 Views
Re: No...
- 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
1307 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
1258 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
1143 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
- 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
1314 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
- 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
1171 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
- 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
1601 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
- 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
1298 Views
Au contraire.
- 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
1438 Views
But why...
- 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
1246 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
- 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
1347 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
- 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
1262 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
- 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
1347 Views
Um not quite
- 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
1192 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
- 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
1181 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
1277 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1276 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
1226 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
1253 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
1134 Views
The problem is...
- 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
1085 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
- 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
1210 Views
I already answered all this...
- 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
1267 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
- 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
1312 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
- 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
1250 Views
No problem
- 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
1299 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
- 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
1346 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
- 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
1196 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
- 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
1265 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
- 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
1227 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
1210 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
1072 Views
One should also remember...
- 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
1118 Views
Eh?
- 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
1148 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
- 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
1236 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
- 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
1234 Views

*NM*
=
- Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela?