Active Users:931 Time:14/11/2026 06:51:48 AM
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.

In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.

Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.

I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 2032 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1421 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1306 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1314 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1422 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1257 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1601 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1297 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1437 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1246 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1343 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1346 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1261 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1346 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1191 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1601 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1587 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1180 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1276 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1275 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1225 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1252 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1133 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 1084 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1209 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1266 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1311 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1148 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1275 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1249 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1298 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1199 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 652 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1345 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1195 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1264 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1226 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1188 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 1127 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1329 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1208 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 1071 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 1081 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 1117 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1147 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1235 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1233 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 1037 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1255 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1187 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 1047 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1294 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1173 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 1115 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1365 Views

Reply to Message