Active Users:1212 Time:14/09/2025 11:19:26 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM
We know from RJ that there was a previous version of SH in TDR, when Ishy was still around, SH 0.5. As said, we also have a SH PoV, where he spies on Sammael & Graendal, muses on his limitations and states that he is a Myrddraal (though a special one) and can't channel the OP (but use the TP). RJ later elaborated on this, telling that the DO projected his shadowy self into the body of a Myrddraal. SH is "the Dark One in shadowy form" and this all the time ("twenty-four/seven" as RJ put it). On the other hand, Moridin thinks of the DO as a separate being.


I'm glad you brought this up. I never liked that when we first saw SH he was SH "0.5" without explanation other than that RJ hadnt worked him out yet.

However, consider that he first appeared as "0.5" while Ishy was alive. Then, we next see SH after Ishy dies and and around his transmigration, but he is now a new and improved SH without explanation. I think one explanation is that he was juxtaposed with Moridin ala Luc/Isam.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1738 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1127 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1028 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 980 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 820 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1048 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 926 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1123 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 974 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1295 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1033 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1132 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 955 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1020 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1026 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 968 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1079 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 929 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1278 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1307 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 887 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1001 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 994 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 945 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 990 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 860 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 820 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 927 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 943 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1044 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 880 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1035 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 969 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1019 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 925 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 501 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1096 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 934 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1003 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 960 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 871 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 816 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1043 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 923 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 822 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 817 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 849 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 876 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 913 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 963 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 773 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1006 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 890 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 815 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1052 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 903 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 789 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1072 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes