Active Users:757 Time:31/10/2026 07:03:00 AM
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' ajfurst Send a noteboard - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM
KOD in that it progressed the storyline at a good pace without chapters out of order, TOM in that TOR were willing to give an extra 100 odd pages to 'play with'.

With a handful of extra chapters (which as noted TOM shows could have been used), TGS could have 'straightened' the timeline and had Perrin start moving out of Malden and Galad captured as a cliffhanger ending as part of TGS, instead of it being part of the TOM prologue.

Hopefully TOM returns to being closer to a structured timeline. It looks like we'll get Rand (and possibly Egwene) at the start screwing it, but hopefully after that we don't see either of them (and by relation the Seanchan) until near the end when Perrin and Mat have 'caught up'.
Reply to message
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed) - 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM 3920 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right - 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM 1723 Views
Pretty sure it's not Egwene... - 25/09/2010 07:07:00 AM 1664 Views
Oh well - I was wrong - 27/09/2010 03:56:59 PM 1364 Views
Ituralde - 25/09/2010 06:29:26 AM 1478 Views
Read the ToM rules - 25/09/2010 07:44:22 AM 1439 Views
I officially hate reviews of WoT (in general) - 25/09/2010 08:10:43 AM 1469 Views
I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 09:45:10 AM 1529 Views
Re: I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 03:50:40 PM 1377 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves... - 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM 1502 Views
I suppose Olver could be the one who takes off Mat's eye *NM* - 25/09/2010 10:01:17 AM 710 Views
The review is now gone. *NM* - 25/09/2010 04:10:59 PM 738 Views
Unfortunately, there's not much left for Elayne to do. - 25/09/2010 07:14:09 PM 1591 Views
I haven't read the review but... - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM 2034 Views
That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM 1537 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review. - 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM 1425 Views
It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM 1438 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM 1348 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:54:28 PM 1364 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM 1583 Views
Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 25/09/2010 10:46:23 PM 1454 Views
Re: Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 26/09/2010 01:11:52 AM 1440 Views
I blame JordanCon too. - 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM 1545 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM 1399 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 07:20:11 AM 1402 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 11:03:35 AM 1430 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 01:07:59 AM 1573 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 07:35:04 AM 1450 Views
Re: That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 09:49:17 PM 1688 Views
Some thoughts on a potential meeting... - 26/09/2010 05:11:06 AM 1543 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM 1572 Views
To me it's two different things - 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM 1632 Views
I agree - 26/09/2010 03:09:04 AM 1471 Views
My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 03:50:36 AM 1495 Views
Re: My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 11:42:12 PM 1747 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM 1417 Views
Re: KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 09:35:41 PM 1568 Views
Whose really to blame though? - 27/09/2010 03:43:30 AM 1414 Views
A suggestion? - 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM 1515 Views
Is there a copy of the review somewhere? *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:40:22 AM 810 Views
The review is back up... - 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM 1354 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM - 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM 1391 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM 662 Views
It was... - 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM 1236 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM* - 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM 665 Views
What do you mean? - 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM 1370 Views
It was at the very bottom of the post and hard to find - 28/09/2010 12:44:56 AM 1184 Views
Olver - 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM 1537 Views
He's Demandred, natch. - 27/09/2010 03:54:09 PM 1240 Views
Re: Olver - 27/09/2010 05:42:25 PM 1360 Views
Re: Olver darkfriend? - 28/09/2010 12:02:11 AM 1407 Views
'Tis a shame. I love spoilers. - 27/09/2010 03:16:02 PM 1411 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues - 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM 1381 Views
Not true... - 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM 1307 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same. - 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM 1374 Views
I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM 1243 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 02:00:59 AM 1288 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM 2182 Views
Not true indeed... and.... - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM 1627 Views
Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 28/09/2010 03:31:24 AM 1274 Views
Re: Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 13/10/2010 01:32:12 AM 1634 Views

Reply to Message