Active Users:756 Time:02/05/2026 07:07:08 PM
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. Keira Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM
Yeah, too bad Olver =/= Gaidal. :(

Taimandred's another great example; the only reason it's not an OBVIOUS fact is the author said point blank it's not true. But OTHERWISE it's an airtight, irrefutable and utterly compelling theory. :P


Oh, it was all in the master plan to do it like that. Misdirection, my dear boy. Misdirection.
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 2091 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 556 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 1103 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 1045 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1391 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 1111 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 929 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 972 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 963 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 1020 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 1071 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 977 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 942 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 1094 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 1038 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 542 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1296 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 441 Views

Reply to Message