Active Users:2180 Time:14/08/2026 08:18:31 AM
The fact that either is right be accident does not make them less of a bitch. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 14/11/2010 12:15:36 AM
LPD's opposition was not founded on anticipation of the true danger (double taint - tSaSG says "No one anticipated the Dark One's counter-stroke." Not even LPD. Her plan was lame-ass too, and she was WRONG about LTT destroying the Pattern or freeing the Dark One or whatever her objection was to his plan. Speaking of Hindsight, even with foreknowledge of the Taint, LTT would STILL have been right to go ahead. It was worth the cost, frankly. Sealing up the Dark One is WORTH a disease the kills a fraction of 1% of the male population, regardless of how much collateral damage is done with it. They were losing the war, and there was no end in sight. LPD objected to a valid strategy for reasons that proved to be unfounded, and the accidental benefit of her resistance to cooperation does not exonerate her. That would be like claiming that Egwene's carelessness in getting captured, and stupidity in replacing the properly prepared operative to change the chain are justified because it enabled her rescue of Adelorna.

Egwene lacks similar reasons or basis for her opposition, and as Rand's final PoV implies, the motivation of her opposition is almost certainly his ta'veren inducing her to gather the rulers so he can use them for HIS purposes. The fact that his ta'veren nature and the Pattern use her in this purpose in no way exonerates her either. If she were more cooperative or positively minded, she could be used to bring them all there to support Rand. Not to mention (and you cannot deny this, as it is the basis on your claim that there is a higher purpose to her actions than her own intentions), how she is going about it is completely retarded. What is a whole massive army gathered in one place going to do to dissuade Rand? He marched out of the Aiel Waste prepared for, and accepting the possibility of every nation west of the Dragonwall to be hostile to him. She was in the room when he said as much, and has observed him grow much harder since then. At worst, she's gathering all the opposition in one place where he can incinerate them with one weave. At best, she's transporting a lot of people to sit in this field with their thumbs up their asses while she and their leaders try to persuade Rand otherwise, and she is abusing the prestige of her office to leave their homelands dangerously unguarded. The burning of Caemlyn is on her head.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Egwene's stupid objection to Rand - 10/11/2010 03:19:44 PM 3020 Views
Re: Egwene's stupid objection to Rand - 10/11/2010 03:25:26 PM 2144 Views
Re: Egwene's stupid objection to Rand - 10/11/2010 03:29:43 PM 1696 Views
Re: Egwene's stupid objection to Rand - 10/11/2010 08:15:57 PM 1746 Views
Especially that she is gathering armies to convince/force Rand... - 10/11/2010 03:33:09 PM 2159 Views
You still believe in Terez's doomed theory? - 10/11/2010 03:48:08 PM 1726 Views
No, I never did. *NM* - 10/11/2010 03:52:14 PM 906 Views
Oh ok, a lot of people seemed passionate about defending it - 10/11/2010 04:09:51 PM 1534 Views
...armies already oathsworn to him - 11/11/2010 03:27:11 AM 1507 Views
Can anyone explain to me why she needs armies for this, anyway? - 10/11/2010 06:27:25 PM 2007 Views
Re: Egwene is being played - 10/11/2010 06:42:35 PM 1756 Views
Hah! I agree! - 10/11/2010 07:20:39 PM 1594 Views
So what - 10/11/2010 08:45:53 PM 1629 Views
Rand is the Dragon Reborn. That doesn't mean he's the savior of the world. - 10/11/2010 08:57:37 PM 1540 Views
No, he's the ONLY one who CAN save it. - 14/11/2010 12:20:39 AM 1607 Views
Totally - 11/11/2010 12:49:11 PM 1425 Views
Re: Can anyone explain to me why she needs armies for this, anyway? - 12/11/2010 01:48:58 AM 1698 Views
I would find that unsatisfying and not quite logical - 12/11/2010 05:57:09 PM 1743 Views
Re: I would find that unsatisfying and not quite logical - 12/11/2010 08:01:58 PM 1483 Views
That doesn’t actually invalidates my point - 13/11/2010 10:20:13 PM 1467 Views
You just don't seem to understand... - 14/11/2010 12:32:06 AM 1564 Views
Her objection is based out of a fear borne of good reasoning - 10/11/2010 06:47:30 PM 1646 Views
Of course you'd say that. You just won't get past your prejudice in favor of her, can you? - 13/11/2010 03:01:08 AM 1567 Views
because Egwene has an incredibly important purpose - 13/11/2010 07:49:58 AM 1568 Views
Re: because Egwene has an incredibly important purpose - 13/11/2010 12:01:20 PM 1623 Views
Re: - 13/11/2010 02:50:22 PM 1452 Views
Re: Re: - 13/11/2010 04:16:43 PM 1559 Views
Re: Re: - 13/11/2010 07:14:01 PM 1446 Views
Re: Re: - 13/11/2010 07:25:35 PM 1427 Views
"Wait, Rand! You have 2,394 more privates to hear from, and then the corporals...." Yeah. Great plan - 14/11/2010 12:17:44 AM 1505 Views
Re: - 14/11/2010 08:21:46 PM 1368 Views
The fact that either is right be accident does not make them less of a bitch. - 14/11/2010 12:15:36 AM 1635 Views
Maybe you should ask Lews Therin... - 14/11/2010 05:46:24 AM 1540 Views
It seems that way to us.... - 12/11/2010 07:14:42 PM 1573 Views
Lews Therin Telamon Reborn. - 14/11/2010 12:56:25 AM 1438 Views
About that.... - 14/11/2010 09:25:02 PM 1425 Views

Reply to Message