deeper analysis of WoT issues than most. Even more, he's upfront about points of contention, acknowledging that he might be wrong, and admitting that he has to make an educated guess.

DomA clearly put a lot of effort into thinking about what was "wrong" with these books, and expressed it very well. His ideas about the books - which had always been intended as one novel - make a lot of sense. And DomA found a lot of facts to back them up. It's no wonder that I agree with him, though not everyone has to.

Having more to say than other people doesn't make someone more likely to be right. The quality of the thoughts that people express, however, *is* something that influences people and lends weight to one's arguments. It's even better when you get someone who "plays fair" in their arguments - ie, isn't going to simply go off bombastically (you know who you are), or downplay the flaws in their logic (ditto), or just say "what's up with X?"

By those standards, DomA posts consistently score a 10/10 with me and others... Your mileage may vary.