Active Users:704 Time:23/03/2026 08:42:34 AM
/tGS: These are damned good books. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
I mean woah. I care again. I'm passionate about WoT again.
I actually want to know what happens next, not just because it's the Last Battle. It's amazing how much more exciting the finish line looks when you aren't plodding deliberately on towards it!!

ye God I actually laughed with giddy excitement at these books for the first time in years!!


Stuff your time lines. We're goin' to WAR, BABY! WAAAARRRRR!!!!


((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1682 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 409 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1038 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1033 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 922 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 896 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 958 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1014 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 902 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1011 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 858 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1044 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 888 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1033 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 893 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1109 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 956 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 925 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 962 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 419 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 844 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 929 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 811 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 432 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1080 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 875 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 934 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 904 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 858 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 851 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 983 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 871 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 966 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 858 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 838 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 435 Views

Reply to Message