Active Users:410 Time:17/06/2025 12:32:35 AM
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))

How could you say this? You reach the end then jump back in chapter 2 to go over the same timeline.

Once the latest Cooper timeline comes out I'm going to read the chapters in a chronological order (or as close to as can be gotten). I expect it highlight even more how stuffing Perrin and Mat's setbacks and Avi's visions after Veins of Gold takes away from the sense of despair (A Memory of Light) RJ was trying to show before Rand's epiphany.

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

'Team Light' would have looked fraked. A Rand victory almost as bad as defeat, the other two ta'veren tied down, Egwene no longer able to influence the Tower Aes Sedai, with the Seanchan plan to attack revealed (but not yet launched) and Avi's vision to ram it all home.

TOM would have the showed 'Team Light' (except the Seanchan) getting their act together, with all plot lines pulling out of despair / setbacks at once (except how the Seanchan will eventually be dealt with).


I agree 100% with this. There are massive problems to the timeline as it is now. Sanderson has left little to no "anchor" events which allow us to puzzle out when things are happening in relation to each other. I suspect this is because he doesn't know himself. Sanderson has claimed RJ's chronology is "extremely complex". Apparently it is too complex for him to get right, while fans like Steven Cooper have been able to make a timeline of the books prior to KoD with a little effort. After that, of course, the timeline went out the window.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1495 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 338 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 853 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 856 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 777 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 722 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 789 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 832 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 723 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 835 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 699 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 871 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 720 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 860 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 727 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 914 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 779 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 767 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 773 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 342 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 695 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 754 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 656 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 357 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 881 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 710 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 777 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 725 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 703 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 675 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 831 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 684 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 811 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 692 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 672 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 355 Views

Reply to Message