Active Users:903 Time:02/11/2025 09:37:48 PM
Not so much charlene Send a noteboard - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
I mean woah. I care again. I'm passionate about WoT again.
I actually want to know what happens next, not just because it's the Last Battle. It's amazing how much more exciting the finish line looks when you aren't plodding deliberately on towards it!!

ye God I actually laughed with giddy excitement at these books for the first time in years!!


Stuff your time lines. We're goin' to WAR, BABY! WAAAARRRRR!!!!


((As a side note, a lot of people have mentioned the bridging between tGS and ToM. If you read the two books right after another like I did, it is an incredibly smooth and sensible transition and I encourage you to take this into consideration. I hardly felt like I switched books.))


I think I have almost the opposite reaction. I've been having the same problem with TGS And TOM that I had with Mistborn. I really liked the Mistborn premise but I simply couldn't make myself care about any of the characters, when people died I thought "meh" and kept reading which is not what you want in a book. I now find myself feeling to some degree the same way about his WOT books. While there are still scenes that moved me they all fell a little flat, the only reason I had any emotional investment in them at all is down to the long standing relationship I have with the characters involved through years of reading and re-reading WOT. You could say I was moved in spite of Brandon's writing, not because of it.

There are bits I found funny and laughed out loud at too but excited for the end? Not really. I'll keep reading because I want to know what happens and how it ends, not because I've been drawn into the story and absolutely *have* to turn one more page.

I also read TGS and TOM one after the other and would have to disagree wth your comment there too. the timeline jumping around was very noticeable and not sensible or smooth at all - after hearing of Perrin being in Caemlyn with the Queen we suddenly go to him being mired in the middle of nowhere. And Tam, who was last time we saw him with Rand, is with Perrin. No, wait, he's with Rand. But no, he's with Perrin again. My sister also reads WOT but doesn't visit any fan sites and she found it incredibly confusing as she had no idea about Rand and Egwene's timeline being so far ahead of everyone else, she's chalked it up to bad writing and asked me to just tell her what happens in the next one as she doesn't think she'll be able to follow it!

C xx
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1585 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 374 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 929 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 934 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 846 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 807 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 858 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 913 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 814 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 913 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 773 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 956 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 798 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 942 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 801 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1019 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 850 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 843 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 856 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 383 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 766 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 827 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 729 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 397 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 976 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 791 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 849 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 813 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 772 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 757 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 908 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 762 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 886 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 773 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 752 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 400 Views

Reply to Message