I think I have almost the opposite reaction. I've been having the same problem with TGS And TOM that I had with Mistborn. I really liked the Mistborn premise but I simply couldn't make myself care about any of the characters, when people died I thought "meh" and kept reading which is not what you want in a book. I now find myself feeling to some degree the same way about his WOT books. While there are still scenes that moved me they all fell a little flat, the only reason I had any emotional investment in them at all is down to the long standing relationship I have with the characters involved through years of reading and re-reading WOT. You could say I was moved in spite of Brandon's writing, not because of it.
Brandon (in his own books too) is good at build up, poor at emotional endings. RJ was always excellent at them. I'm 100% certain his Morgase reunions would have been wonderful.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1660 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
1009 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
982 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
879 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
834 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
1016 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
1002 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
1082 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
918 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
899 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
823 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
929 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
816 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
422 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
1051 Views
I agree with this
- 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
845 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
911 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
873 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
826 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
821 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
1135 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
791 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
874 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
919 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes.
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
886 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
886 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
572 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
927 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
823 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
921 Views

