Active Users:646 Time:23/03/2026 10:35:22 AM
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
it would NO WAY be a one book ending that some ppl here keep saying he would have made the book.


That is not what "ppl" are saying. "People" are well aware that this book might have been split even with RJ behind the wheel. The thing is, though, that RJ would have split the story in a way faithful to his outline. Sanderson's sin here is that he had the arrogance to completely restructure RJ's outline, which has resulted in much poorer story.


"From" a literary mind. Also, it is quite easily inferrable from comments Sanderson has made. Frankly, after TGS he had painted himself into a corner. He made a botched-job of this.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1683 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 410 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1040 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1034 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 923 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 897 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 959 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1015 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 904 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1012 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 859 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1045 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 890 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1034 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 896 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1111 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 957 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 926 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 963 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 421 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 846 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 930 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 813 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 432 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1081 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 877 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 935 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 905 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 859 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 851 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 985 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 872 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 968 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 859 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 839 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 436 Views

Reply to Message