Active Users:1175 Time:31/07/2026 06:28:03 AM
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
it would NO WAY be a one book ending that some ppl here keep saying he would have made the book.


That is not what "ppl" are saying. "People" are well aware that this book might have been split even with RJ behind the wheel. The thing is, though, that RJ would have split the story in a way faithful to his outline. Sanderson's sin here is that he had the arrogance to completely restructure RJ's outline, which has resulted in much poorer story.


"From" a literary mind. Also, it is quite easily inferrable from comments Sanderson has made. Frankly, after TGS he had painted himself into a corner. He made a botched-job of this.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1736 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 439 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1102 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1094 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 982 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 955 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1019 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1077 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 962 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1071 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 920 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1102 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 949 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1098 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 980 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1176 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1011 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 996 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1025 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 453 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 906 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1001 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 880 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 465 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1146 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 949 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 991 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 960 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 930 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 904 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1062 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 936 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1029 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 911 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 904 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 473 Views

Reply to Message