Active Users:685 Time:06/02/2026 04:49:14 AM
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans Zeratul Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM

COT was basically 'WOW big channeling going on, view point 7 on it, followed by view point 8', with some 'Woah is me, Faile was captured before and I still haven't gotten her by the end' with the only bits of action Ituralde's in the prologue and Egwene's capture in the Epilogue.

TGS split as I suggest would still have had:

Rand's descent and the death of Semirhage
Egwene winning over the Aes Sedai until Elaida has her imprisoned (cliffhanger 1)
Mat fighting in hinderstap then the Gholam at the end (cliffhanger 2)
Perrin fighting Slayer, then finding himself trapped by the Dreamspike having to either fight the Whitecloaks or win his trial (cliffhanger 3)
Aviendha's visions

Plus you still had Tylee and Ituralde's battles in TGS would still be there. Nothing like COT. And with 3 cliffhangers at the end I'd be more inclined to think fans would be even more highly anticipating TOM to see what happened.


Sure, it would've been better than CoT, but this is a given, pretty much anything is It still would've been a disappointing and incomplete book since it wouldn't have a single plot arch completed and nothing major would've been resolved. I know I'd have been angry if I had to wait another year and with every plotline ending in a cliffhanger. Maybe even angry enough to give up on the series or at least wait for the paperback.

I'd much rather have a mixed up timeline of the different characters and every volume with its proper resolutions. than a whole book in which nothing major is resolved and everything is left for the next one.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1660 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 393 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1009 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1002 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 894 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 870 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 926 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 981 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 879 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 984 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 833 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1016 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 858 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1002 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 869 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1081 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 918 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 898 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 929 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 409 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 815 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 897 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 784 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 422 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1051 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 844 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 911 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 872 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 825 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 821 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 959 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 840 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 942 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 834 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 809 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 424 Views

Reply to Message