Active Users:265 Time:11/05/2024 09:18:28 PM
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM
yeah, isn't that how the "deathgates" work? Shadow spawn can't survive being touched by the O.P. So when they pass through a gateway it kills them. Tollocs check in but they don't check out.


well, IIRC the deathgates mostly work on the principle that the gateway edges are extremely sharp, and that's the reason they open and close and they have not a round shape: that way, no one would survive a deathgate. The fact that shadowspawn can't pass through them is just a "plus".


The aim of the deathgate to kill a trolloc is to pass it through the gateway thus killing it in the process... I imagine if a channeler wanted an extremely sharp edge to slice trollocs they can use focused air or anything else. Gateways for that purpose are not cost effective.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 1959 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1159 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1002 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 964 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 403 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 427 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 866 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 700 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 920 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 401 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 805 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 818 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 797 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 839 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 766 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 798 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 651 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 741 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 741 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 745 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 736 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 664 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 871 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 730 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 755 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 758 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 653 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 737 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 839 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 798 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 686 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 427 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 855 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 669 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 667 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 363 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 845 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 768 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 740 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 671 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 763 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 770 Views

Reply to Message