Active Users:782 Time:14/05/2026 08:38:24 PM
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM
Err... another one.

Mat and Elayne's plan to kill the gholam relied on forcing it through a gateway. Ignoring the question of whether it should be able to survive a gateway or not, there is still a hole in the plan to make the gateway in the first place.

They hoped that the gholam would not notice the gateway if it was opened from "the other side" (in this case, the skimming place). The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned, so there is no way that one of the Aes Sedai or Kin could have Skimmed to that place.

The plan is broken, but not irrevocably so. All attempts of hiding the gateway by opening it from the other side would have to be abandoned (not that it did any good anyway). Hell, the gholam would probably charge right through a gateway if it saw an Aes Sedai trying to escape through it.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2472 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1605 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1410 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1440 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 622 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 622 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1303 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1133 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1312 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 593 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1313 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1264 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1304 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1307 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1252 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1280 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1154 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 1119 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 1051 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 1110 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 592 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 1146 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1226 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1226 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1170 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1257 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1118 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1377 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1208 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1266 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1252 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1114 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1170 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1437 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1258 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1117 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 701 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1314 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1073 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1100 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 562 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1309 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1291 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1192 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1200 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1151 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1213 Views

Reply to Message