Active Users:952 Time:02/11/2025 04:53:15 PM
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.
Provisional calendar for Towers of Midnight: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0ApFWTyzG9G_UdHZCUjQzVGNLeUJyMkUycXkzQlExSFE&output=html
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2339 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1447 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1275 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1278 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 558 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 559 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1172 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 999 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1188 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 518 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1177 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1126 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1140 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1160 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1103 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1108 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 989 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1064 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1093 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1022 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1117 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 963 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1231 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1049 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1115 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1097 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 970 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1016 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1237 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1096 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 970 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 639 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1188 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 932 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 946 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 510 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1151 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1114 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1025 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1062 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1019 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1086 Views

Reply to Message