Active Users:776 Time:03/02/2026 09:22:24 AM
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM
I may be wrong on this, but I thought that the biggest problem with the gholam going through the gateway is that the gholam acts like Mat's medallion and stops the weaves. In this case, it shouldn't be able to go through any kind of gateway but rather destroy the weave for the gateway upon touching it.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2394 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1527 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1327 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1356 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 592 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 590 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1235 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1061 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1244 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 556 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1245 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1193 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1222 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1241 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1174 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1200 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1073 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1154 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1148 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1097 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1179 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1043 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1296 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1118 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1193 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1165 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1037 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1091 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1335 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1178 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1036 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 664 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1251 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1001 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1019 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 532 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1232 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1209 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1106 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1125 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1079 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1146 Views

Reply to Message