Active Users:620 Time:02/08/2025 08:50:41 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM
Which does not require one to know a location.


Which requires skimming to the house, which requires knowing the house. There would be no problem if they opened the gateway from the house, but they avoided that to try to stop the gholam from noticing.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2253 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1386 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1203 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1186 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 518 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 519 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1090 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 913 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1114 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 486 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1124 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1031 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1067 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1074 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1044 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1048 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 883 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 915 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 849 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 895 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 490 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 924 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 970 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1032 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 936 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1031 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 877 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1164 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 948 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1036 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 988 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 882 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 944 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1143 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 1018 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1010 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 911 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 603 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1102 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 870 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 880 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 467 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1060 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1031 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 955 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 971 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 962 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 989 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes