Active Users:575 Time:02/08/2025 05:50:47 PM
get over it Japhy Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.


Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2252 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1385 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1202 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1185 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 517 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 518 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1088 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 912 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1113 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 485 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1123 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1030 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1066 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1073 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1044 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1047 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 882 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 969 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1031 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 935 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1030 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 876 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1163 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 947 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1035 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 987 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 881 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 943 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1142 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1009 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 909 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 602 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1101 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 869 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 879 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 466 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1059 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1031 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 954 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 970 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 961 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 988 Views

Reply to Message