Active Users:610 Time:03/08/2025 08:39:25 AM
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM
Skimming
The ability to open a gateway to a dark dimension (not well defined or understood), move through that dimension, and open another gateway back into the real world in a different location. First mention is TFoH,Ch6. Anyone of sufficient strength and knowledge can Skim. Skimming requires detailed knowledge of the place one is Skimming to. Skimming was not even known as a lost Talent. (ACoS,Ch9)
-Encyclopaedia Wot - Talents

What Egwene had pried from Moghedien was a way to journey from a place you did not know well to one you did. Slower than Traveling, Skimming was not even one of the lost Telents...
-A Crown of Swords - Ch9, p186



There would be more in The Fires of Heaven when Asmo was explaining things to Rand.
This message last edited by rAndy aL on 28/12/2010 at 01:03:12 AM
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2254 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1388 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1205 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1188 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 518 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 519 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1092 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 915 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1114 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 486 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1126 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1033 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1068 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1074 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1045 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1050 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 885 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 970 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1032 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 938 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1033 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 878 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1166 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 950 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1038 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 990 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 884 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 946 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1145 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1010 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 911 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 603 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1104 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 872 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 881 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 467 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1063 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1032 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 957 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 972 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 962 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 991 Views

Reply to Message