Active Users:383 Time:01/05/2025 01:56:05 PM
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2133 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1346 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1165 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1148 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 501 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 501 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1052 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 867 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1078 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 467 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1014 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 979 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 956 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1036 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 935 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1007 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 832 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 914 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 924 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 898 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 911 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 836 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1054 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 895 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 918 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 928 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 842 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 907 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1029 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 962 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 868 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 521 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1061 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 828 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 839 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 445 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1010 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 931 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 913 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 846 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 926 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 952 Views

Reply to Message