Active Users:395 Time:02/05/2025 03:46:32 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ Send a noteboard - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.


Caemlyn is a big city. They would need to organise a lot of pre-determined locations to have any sort of coverage, which would be determined by how far Talmanes was prepared to lead the gholam. I would guess the he wouldn't try for more than 100 metres/yards. How many places would they need to give that sort of coverage across the city? If it is 1km across, then 100 locations. 10km, then 10,000 locations. Too many.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2133 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1348 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1165 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1148 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 501 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 501 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1053 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 867 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1079 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 468 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1014 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 981 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 958 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1036 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 935 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1009 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 833 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 878 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 807 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 859 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 472 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 882 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 914 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 924 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 900 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 911 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 838 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1056 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 897 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 921 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 931 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 843 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 907 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1029 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 980 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 964 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 868 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 521 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1063 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 829 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 842 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 445 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1012 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 933 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 915 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 847 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 928 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 954 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes