Active Users:578 Time:02/08/2025 07:24:38 PM
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... Shannow Send a noteboard - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM
Males are stronger than women by a pretty good amount (RJ claimed there were "several levels of male strength above women" ) ... Egwene (at less than full potential) +R+L =(at least) Male Forsaken ... which would make those 3 stronger than Lanfear by a fair margin. Effectively Lanfear = Rand, but on a raw power scale she would not ... this is something Egwene would not yet realize having never really faced such a situation.


When Egwene thinks that she+Romanda+Lelaine might match 1 male Forsaken, she of course does not base this on the male's actual strength, but on his effective strength.

Because she cannot sense a male's actual strength. All she can judge it on is his effective strength, such as Rand demonstrated when she and Elayne were treated like "kittens by a mastiff" when trying to teach him in the Stone of Tear.

The point is, she doesn't mean that she and R+L can match the RAW strength of a male Forsaken, as she has no idea how to even measure that raw strength.

What she seeks to match is what he can effectively DO with that power. Meaning his effective strength. Thus, she is not comparing Her, Romanda and Lelaine to a strength level several levels above Lanfear.

Instead, the comparison is to Lanfear's effective strength level, which is the same as a strong Male Forsaken's effective strength level.

Simple really, once you apply logic instead of wishful thinking.
This message last edited by Shannow on 03/11/2012 at 11:09:24 PM
Reply to message
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM 1606 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow - 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM 943 Views
One more point here - 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM 822 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key... - 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM 1055 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better - 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM 1011 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible... - 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM 972 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean - 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM 836 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD... - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM 710 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear - 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM 876 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention. - 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM 797 Views
OMG no it is NOT! - 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM 703 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve. - 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM 1002 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM 848 Views
Confusing post... - 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM 900 Views
Dreadlord is essentially describing a lognormal distribution - 02/11/2012 07:21:39 PM 791 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong - 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM 927 Views
A non-linear 21 point scale is fine... - 02/11/2012 11:02:48 PM 958 Views
I've been operating off of the scale I described for years - 02/11/2012 11:25:27 PM 850 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM 885 Views
Not true - 02/11/2012 08:52:42 PM 879 Views
Re: Not true - 03/11/2012 09:19:11 AM 895 Views
Read my other posts - 03/11/2012 04:19:15 PM 702 Views
Not quite - 03/11/2012 08:02:05 AM 848 Views
I think it's about skill not strength - 03/11/2012 04:38:07 PM 714 Views
I think the number is about 10 - 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM 902 Views
Nope - 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM 826 Views
Re: Nope - 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM 859 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM 813 Views
Re: Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 10:15:10 PM 863 Views
*shrugs* - 03/11/2012 10:25:18 PM 751 Views
Re: *shrugs* - 04/11/2012 07:12:21 AM 952 Views
You have 4 markers and you should use them all - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM 687 Views
Indeed - 10/11/2012 03:59:51 PM 828 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM 883 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM 841 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:02:58 PM 863 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:56:50 PM 939 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this - 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM 894 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM 660 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor - 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM 757 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote - 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM 820 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about - 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM 767 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM 830 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand - 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM 739 Views
Nonsense. - 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM 765 Views
Believe as you will - 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM 932 Views
That's a classic. - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM 788 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series - 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM 683 Views
Hmm... - 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM 1017 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you - 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM 826 Views

Reply to Message