Active Users:2692 Time:03/05/2026 12:41:00 PM
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" Joel Send a noteboard - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM

View original post
View original postThen the quoted section basically says, "if comparing SOLELY strength, ignoring ALL else, the strongest man was as strong as the strongest woman." We know that is false because the male scale has levels above the female scales highest, and the rest of the entrys context consistently shows that comparison is not apples to oranges: Strength x is strength x, for male AND female, though a woman will have more skill than they would have as a man with all skills developed to the same degree.
The dexterity advantage is women only, and is inherent. The section is basically saying that if you ognore knowledge, practice, and other acquired characteristics, and stick to inherent stuff alone, the strongest man and strongest woman are the same.

Particularly when they make that explicit by clarifying that their statement is "avoiding the advantages of dexterity" etc. All that is sure is that WHATEVER they meant was very poorly expressed, because we must figure it out before we even CAN decide if we agree.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 24/06/2015 09:56:33 PM 2389 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 08:01:04 AM 1303 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:49:52 PM 1355 Views
That still would not make sense - 25/06/2015 09:22:48 PM 1384 Views
It would - 01/07/2015 07:17:09 PM 1373 Views
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM 1498 Views
Re: That still would not make sense - 01/10/2015 11:54:06 PM 1467 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:23:32 PM 1589 Views
I suspect... - 25/06/2015 05:47:59 PM 1391 Views
Re: I suspect... - 25/06/2015 06:33:10 PM 1468 Views
Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:22:36 PM 1411 Views
Re: Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:56:22 PM 1346 Views
Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 27/06/2015 08:19:19 PM 1408 Views
Re: Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 29/06/2015 07:58:55 PM 1273 Views
Since she looks her age I suspect reaching it is almost entirely due to natural longevity - 29/06/2015 09:16:21 PM 1226 Views
Not when you consider Morgase - 30/06/2015 09:02:35 PM 1279 Views
Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 02/07/2015 12:21:55 AM 1439 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 08/07/2015 03:26:43 AM 1295 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 09/07/2015 02:25:58 AM 1394 Views
RJ did say... - 09/07/2015 07:13:01 AM 1216 Views
Morgase spent nearly 2 years in the Tower - 09/07/2015 03:22:06 PM 1599 Views
And countless hours of frustrated focus to--fleetingly--grasp the source ONCE (i.e. less than twice) - 10/07/2015 02:51:53 AM 1481 Views
doesn't make sense as you describe it - 10/07/2015 04:42:31 PM 1208 Views
It does not make sense as Jordan describes it either - 10/07/2015 09:00:36 PM 1447 Views
I agree with all of this - 10/07/2015 05:21:40 PM 1279 Views
You are wise - 10/07/2015 09:06:16 PM 1351 Views
66 levels for women + 6 ( ? ) for men - 27/06/2015 10:58:16 AM 1557 Views
This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 02:39:01 PM 1453 Views
Re: This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 09:39:43 PM 1410 Views
Some of it is... - 01/07/2015 08:10:00 PM 1516 Views

Reply to Message