Active Users:275 Time:22/05/2024 03:58:47 AM
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" Joel Send a noteboard - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM

View original post
View original postThen the quoted section basically says, "if comparing SOLELY strength, ignoring ALL else, the strongest man was as strong as the strongest woman." We know that is false because the male scale has levels above the female scales highest, and the rest of the entrys context consistently shows that comparison is not apples to oranges: Strength x is strength x, for male AND female, though a woman will have more skill than they would have as a man with all skills developed to the same degree.
The dexterity advantage is women only, and is inherent. The section is basically saying that if you ognore knowledge, practice, and other acquired characteristics, and stick to inherent stuff alone, the strongest man and strongest woman are the same.

Particularly when they make that explicit by clarifying that their statement is "avoiding the advantages of dexterity" etc. All that is sure is that WHATEVER they meant was very poorly expressed, because we must figure it out before we even CAN decide if we agree.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 24/06/2015 09:56:33 PM 1948 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 08:01:04 AM 848 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:49:52 PM 951 Views
That still would not make sense - 25/06/2015 09:22:48 PM 945 Views
It would - 01/07/2015 07:17:09 PM 981 Views
However many ways they meant "dexterity," ALL are precluded by saying, "pure strength" - 02/07/2015 12:09:11 AM 1010 Views
Re: That still would not make sense - 01/10/2015 11:54:06 PM 1011 Views
Re: Strength in the OP: the Encyclopedia chapter is out! - 25/06/2015 05:23:32 PM 1118 Views
I suspect... - 25/06/2015 05:47:59 PM 961 Views
Re: I suspect... - 25/06/2015 06:33:10 PM 1018 Views
Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:22:36 PM 935 Views
Re: Yeah, a comprehensive scale restricted to AS would not be comprehensive - 25/06/2015 09:56:22 PM 899 Views
Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 27/06/2015 08:19:19 PM 956 Views
Re: Sorilea can GRASP the Source reliably; there is no indication she can USE it - 29/06/2015 07:58:55 PM 842 Views
Since she looks her age I suspect reaching it is almost entirely due to natural longevity - 29/06/2015 09:16:21 PM 793 Views
Not when you consider Morgase - 30/06/2015 09:02:35 PM 881 Views
Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 02/07/2015 12:21:55 AM 884 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 08/07/2015 03:26:43 AM 849 Views
Re: Sorilea has been at it far longer than Morgase - 09/07/2015 02:25:58 AM 879 Views
RJ did say... - 09/07/2015 07:13:01 AM 801 Views
Morgase spent nearly 2 years in the Tower - 09/07/2015 03:22:06 PM 1055 Views
And countless hours of frustrated focus to--fleetingly--grasp the source ONCE (i.e. less than twice) - 10/07/2015 02:51:53 AM 961 Views
doesn't make sense as you describe it - 10/07/2015 04:42:31 PM 778 Views
It does not make sense as Jordan describes it either - 10/07/2015 09:00:36 PM 983 Views
I agree with all of this - 10/07/2015 05:21:40 PM 861 Views
You are wise - 10/07/2015 09:06:16 PM 863 Views
66 levels for women + 6 ( ? ) for men - 27/06/2015 10:58:16 AM 1060 Views
This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 02:39:01 PM 989 Views
Re: This thing is all over the place - 30/06/2015 09:39:43 PM 923 Views
Some of it is... - 01/07/2015 08:10:00 PM 1052 Views

Reply to Message