Active Users:317 Time:15/05/2024 01:38:27 PM
True gban007 Send a noteboard - 02/01/2016 05:39:12 AM

View original post
View original post
Just to put my 2 cents into the overall conversation on this thread

Do some of the issues we see with the power looking to change from the early books to later books revolve around Rand and Ishamael?

If so, is there potential that rather than the power changing, that Rand and Ishamael being the champions of light and shadow respectively, have a general innate strength, equivalent to others of 1++ strength, but that at times they become conduits of light / shadow, and so their apparent strength is even higher at those times?

I see this potentially supported by Rand's view of the forsaken in the first book, with the threads they had to the shadow and the differences between Aginor's and Ishamael's, and Rand's display against the shadow at Tarwin's Gap in the first book as well.



And let's not forget that Ishamael wasn't actually using the OP all of the time. He utilized the True Power most of the time and that seems to involve being as strong as the Dark One allows you to be rather than some innate strength level.


Moghedian's boost in strength at the end of the last battle is strong evidence of this I think.
Reply to message
One Power strength: let's play with numbers - 18/12/2015 01:09:06 PM 1897 Views
Actually, I largely agree - 18/12/2015 03:33:27 PM 825 Views
Yup ... note how silent he's been since the Companion came out *NM* - 18/12/2015 05:50:44 PM 453 Views
I've been silent because the Companion is a joke and hardly worth pointing out all the errors... - 19/12/2015 09:37:53 AM 891 Views
Clearly there are mistakes in the Companion - 19/12/2015 03:28:49 PM 809 Views
- 19/12/2015 05:52:29 PM 819 Views
It is easy to accept the Companion. All you have to do is reject the evidence in the books. - 19/12/2015 06:58:41 PM 822 Views
No... - 19/12/2015 08:59:58 PM 838 Views
And let's not forget Mylen - 21/12/2015 09:07:27 PM 890 Views
Splitting flows: the Great Aes Sedai mixup - 22/12/2015 01:34:54 AM 1175 Views
Re: Splitting flows: the Great Aes Sedai mixup - 22/12/2015 06:05:02 AM 920 Views
I have a theory on why - 23/12/2015 05:26:52 PM 684 Views
Re: I have a theory on why - 24/12/2015 09:44:44 AM 707 Views
How I see Traveling... - 24/12/2015 11:35:30 PM 760 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 26/12/2015 10:43:13 AM 759 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 29/12/2015 02:34:58 AM 748 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 30/12/2015 07:41:43 AM 872 Views
Re: How I see Traveling... - 01/01/2016 08:33:34 PM 747 Views
Some thoughts - 20/12/2015 09:29:28 AM 797 Views
My response to your thoughts... - 20/12/2015 07:19:15 PM 834 Views
My thoughts on your thoughts - 21/12/2015 02:34:38 PM 682 Views
Re: My thoughts on your thoughts - 21/12/2015 08:55:40 PM 763 Views
Re: Some thoughts - 22/12/2015 06:21:41 PM 895 Views
No palpitations here ... I pretty much agree with all of this *NM* - 18/12/2015 05:50:08 PM 416 Views
Well this is inconvenient - 19/12/2015 07:38:30 AM 703 Views
hahaha - 19/12/2015 03:09:41 PM 761 Views
Moraine and Siuan level in NS - 30/12/2015 02:13:05 AM 635 Views
Here are my thoughts - 30/12/2015 06:29:02 AM 712 Views
They were the same strength... - 30/12/2015 06:55:18 AM 778 Views
Thanks - 30/12/2015 07:44:22 AM 658 Views
Not really strange... - 30/12/2015 08:02:04 AM 774 Views
Siuan was also a wilder, she was sent to TV when the spark manifested - 30/12/2015 03:50:17 PM 740 Views
Not sure that works - 30/12/2015 07:17:27 AM 777 Views
Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 04:40:28 PM 963 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 05:10:50 PM 816 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 05:52:41 PM 793 Views
Re: Part of this is also about an individual's personality - 30/12/2015 06:15:36 PM 905 Views
Totally - 30/12/2015 06:46:14 PM 861 Views
On Rand and Ishamael - 01/01/2016 09:20:35 PM 692 Views
Re: On Rand and Ishamael - 02/01/2016 01:18:07 AM 611 Views
True - 02/01/2016 05:39:12 AM 802 Views
Re: True - 02/01/2016 07:52:33 PM 694 Views
Re: True - 02/01/2016 10:56:39 PM 782 Views

Reply to Message