Active Users:345 Time:29/04/2024 01:36:42 PM
The Seanchan are not a military culture. That's why they are so good at it. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/10/2016 12:21:36 AM


The Seanchan come to mind.
The only Seanchan we really see are directly involved in the conquest or part of the national security apparatus. The advanced degree of organization actually suggests they are a largely non-military society, in which the military is merely a technical specialty, not a major fact of life, around which everything else revolves, such as in a feudal society (like Westeros in aSoI&F), or a archetypal barbarian culture, or pastoral nomads or peoples like the Aiel & Borderlanders. For those people, warfare and military threats are a way of life, and even if the majority of people don't directly fight, the focus of their society revolves around fighting. No matter how big the project of the Consolidation or the planning for the Return, the way the Seanchan do it, and the bureaucracy involved, suggests this is not a society that thinks with its weapons. Rather it takes a civilian approach to warfare, treating it like a business or a job. Warrior cultures have warriors who happen to be good at logistics or developing weapons or whatnot. The Seanchan go the other way. We have no idea how they treat civilian woman, because we have never seen a single one, only soldiers, nobles and slaves. Which are pretty much the only types of men we see either, which in turn is probably responsible for so many fans focusing only on those aspects of their society and writing it off.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Noticed something odd - 13/10/2016 09:31:54 PM 1066 Views
Familiarity breeds contempt? - 14/10/2016 12:41:44 AM 936 Views
I can see how this would keep a woman from attaining the Shawl - 14/10/2016 03:00:32 PM 556 Views
Re: Familiarity breeds contempt? - 17/10/2016 06:35:20 PM 698 Views
Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 11:25:44 AM 634 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 03:54:23 PM 577 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 04:02:54 PM 552 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 05:03:58 PM 501 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 07:18:13 PM 643 Views
I think politics keeps women away from the Blue - 18/10/2016 10:20:50 PM 532 Views
I think it's RJ's gender commentary - Blue are ambitious, which is not a stereotypical female trait - 19/10/2016 02:57:51 AM 725 Views
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM 573 Views
Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:19:01 PM 695 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:48:17 PM 511 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 06:13:27 PM 609 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 07:14:51 PM 479 Views
I guess that's my issue with it - 20/10/2016 09:53:38 PM 622 Views
Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 08:38:07 AM 554 Views
Re: Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 09:21:13 AM 654 Views
Comparative to joining the Red is how I meant that - 21/10/2016 03:22:46 PM 573 Views
The Seanchan are not a military culture. That's why they are so good at it. - 19/10/2016 12:21:36 AM 581 Views
Forget the "locals"... IIRC Aes Sedai have kids "rarely" not "never". - 14/10/2016 06:40:56 AM 552 Views
Another good point! - 14/10/2016 03:28:44 PM 540 Views
Re: Noticed something odd - 11/11/2016 12:54:24 AM 670 Views
Possibly, - 11/11/2016 08:45:15 PM 747 Views

Reply to Message