Active Users:406 Time:16/05/2024 09:35:37 PM
The Seanchan are not a military culture. That's why they are so good at it. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/10/2016 12:21:36 AM


The Seanchan come to mind.
The only Seanchan we really see are directly involved in the conquest or part of the national security apparatus. The advanced degree of organization actually suggests they are a largely non-military society, in which the military is merely a technical specialty, not a major fact of life, around which everything else revolves, such as in a feudal society (like Westeros in aSoI&F), or a archetypal barbarian culture, or pastoral nomads or peoples like the Aiel & Borderlanders. For those people, warfare and military threats are a way of life, and even if the majority of people don't directly fight, the focus of their society revolves around fighting. No matter how big the project of the Consolidation or the planning for the Return, the way the Seanchan do it, and the bureaucracy involved, suggests this is not a society that thinks with its weapons. Rather it takes a civilian approach to warfare, treating it like a business or a job. Warrior cultures have warriors who happen to be good at logistics or developing weapons or whatnot. The Seanchan go the other way. We have no idea how they treat civilian woman, because we have never seen a single one, only soldiers, nobles and slaves. Which are pretty much the only types of men we see either, which in turn is probably responsible for so many fans focusing only on those aspects of their society and writing it off.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Noticed something odd - 13/10/2016 09:31:54 PM 1070 Views
Familiarity breeds contempt? - 14/10/2016 12:41:44 AM 940 Views
I can see how this would keep a woman from attaining the Shawl - 14/10/2016 03:00:32 PM 561 Views
Re: Familiarity breeds contempt? - 17/10/2016 06:35:20 PM 705 Views
Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 11:25:44 AM 636 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 03:54:23 PM 581 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 04:02:54 PM 557 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 05:03:58 PM 508 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 07:18:13 PM 647 Views
I think politics keeps women away from the Blue - 18/10/2016 10:20:50 PM 536 Views
I think it's RJ's gender commentary - Blue are ambitious, which is not a stereotypical female trait - 19/10/2016 02:57:51 AM 730 Views
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM 576 Views
Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:19:01 PM 698 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:48:17 PM 516 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 06:13:27 PM 612 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 07:14:51 PM 483 Views
I guess that's my issue with it - 20/10/2016 09:53:38 PM 627 Views
Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 08:38:07 AM 562 Views
Re: Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 09:21:13 AM 659 Views
Comparative to joining the Red is how I meant that - 21/10/2016 03:22:46 PM 578 Views
The Seanchan are not a military culture. That's why they are so good at it. - 19/10/2016 12:21:36 AM 585 Views
Forget the "locals"... IIRC Aes Sedai have kids "rarely" not "never". - 14/10/2016 06:40:56 AM 559 Views
Another good point! - 14/10/2016 03:28:44 PM 544 Views
Re: Noticed something odd - 11/11/2016 12:54:24 AM 673 Views
Possibly, - 11/11/2016 08:45:15 PM 753 Views

Reply to Message