Active Users:672 Time:13/12/2025 03:39:14 AM
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM

Thanks for this, was an interesting read!


I don't think the Blues are necessarily politicians, they are idealists and activists, and it is an indicator of the current state of the Tower that idealism and activism translates into political scheming and power games. The political focus is hardly unique to that Ajah, either. How many Yellows do we see running around the world looking to Heal? All of them seem far more oriented toward the Tower than might be expected, and only the Reds have the excuse of being on top of things, what with the world remaining unbroken for three thousand years, and even RJ giving them credit for being so effective at hunting men that they have culled the trait from the population. Every other Ajah's chosen specialization seems to have a negligible effect on the world, except maybe the Whites, who explicitly don't care. What matters in choice of Ajah is how and why you use whatever skills, regardless of with which Ajah they are generally associated.

The Reds find one or two male channelers a year. Effective perhaps but not efficient, what with 200 sisters whose raison d'etre it is to seek them out. And what about the Green? You imply they spend plenty of time in the Borderlands, but what are they doing there? Aisling Noon was the king's advisor in tEotW but there were no Greens at the Gap. Even the White, despite their avowed interest in philosophy, seem to treat it as almost nothing more than some vaguely defined notion of being unemotional (I'm thinking of Alviarin's disdain for the two mathematical logicians).
Reply to message
Noticed something odd - 13/10/2016 09:31:54 PM 1345 Views
Familiarity breeds contempt? - 14/10/2016 12:41:44 AM 1242 Views
I can see how this would keep a woman from attaining the Shawl - 14/10/2016 03:00:32 PM 854 Views
Re: Familiarity breeds contempt? - 17/10/2016 06:35:20 PM 991 Views
Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 11:25:44 AM 950 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 03:54:23 PM 905 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 04:02:54 PM 811 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 05:03:58 PM 809 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 07:18:13 PM 923 Views
I think politics keeps women away from the Blue - 18/10/2016 10:20:50 PM 832 Views
I think it's RJ's gender commentary - Blue are ambitious, which is not a stereotypical female trait - 19/10/2016 02:57:51 AM 1049 Views
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM 880 Views
Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:19:01 PM 1000 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:48:17 PM 799 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 06:13:27 PM 854 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 07:14:51 PM 742 Views
I guess that's my issue with it - 20/10/2016 09:53:38 PM 942 Views
Technically men would only be a threat up to a certain age(which they should know) unless trained.. - 21/10/2016 08:47:20 AM 1085 Views
Male sparkers can spark as late as 30 or so - 21/10/2016 03:16:26 PM 850 Views
Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 08:38:07 AM 839 Views
Re: Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 09:21:13 AM 927 Views
Comparative to joining the Red is how I meant that - 21/10/2016 03:22:46 PM 841 Views
Forget the "locals"... IIRC Aes Sedai have kids "rarely" not "never". - 14/10/2016 06:40:56 AM 824 Views
Another good point! - 14/10/2016 03:28:44 PM 798 Views
Re: Noticed something odd - 11/11/2016 12:54:24 AM 1020 Views
Possibly, - 11/11/2016 08:45:15 PM 1139 Views

Reply to Message