Nope. Balefire doesn't really worry about paradox.
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 02:53:23 AM
Which is why it's dangerous. You only have to worry about resolving paradox if you worry about unmaking reality. Balefire doesn't try to resolve the paradox; that's why it's dangerous.
So it's not that the castle got blasted back a decade or two, thus Graendal was never there, thus Rand never sent the man in, thus he was never compelled.
It's: The castle was there, Rand sent the man in, and then balefired Graendal back a decade or two. There's no Compulsion, because Graendal no longer exists at the point in time the man went to the castle. Even though that's why he went to the castle.
There's no stable timeloops with balefire. It just unravels reality.
So it's not that the castle got blasted back a decade or two, thus Graendal was never there, thus Rand never sent the man in, thus he was never compelled.
It's: The castle was there, Rand sent the man in, and then balefired Graendal back a decade or two. There's no Compulsion, because Graendal no longer exists at the point in time the man went to the castle. Even though that's why he went to the castle.
There's no stable timeloops with balefire. It just unravels reality.
I amuse myself.
Forsaken update... who's dead and who's not
- 01/11/2009 06:49:13 PM
1723 Views
Moridin is alive, but whether he is in fact well remains to be seen, no?
*NM*
- 01/11/2009 07:47:29 PM
418 Views
*NM*
- 01/11/2009 07:47:29 PM
418 Views
Graendal
- 01/11/2009 08:23:31 PM
1053 Views
Re: Graendal
- 01/11/2009 10:32:06 PM
910 Views
Wow, you make serious posts on this board.
- 02/11/2009 02:04:48 AM
803 Views
Methinks another channeler (Darkfriend/Black Ajah) placed the Compulsion on Rand's bait.
- 02/11/2009 01:44:07 AM
764 Views
Two reasons: The level of Compulsion, and Forsaken paranoia.
- 02/11/2009 02:47:57 AM
944 Views
Nope. Balefire doesn't really worry about paradox.
- 02/11/2009 02:53:23 AM
783 Views
Re: No. 8
- 01/11/2009 08:56:24 PM
935 Views
Re: No. 8
- 01/11/2009 08:59:12 PM
840 Views
Fingers
- 01/11/2009 09:12:51 PM
816 Views
I'm guessing she didn't get them within the first three days *NM*
- 01/11/2009 09:18:41 PM
351 Views
We don't see her feet either. But only one finger was gone, likely only one ter'angreal. *NM*
- 02/11/2009 12:01:53 AM
400 Views
I'm 99% sure that was Mesaana. (Sheriam stated specifically that it wasn't Halima) *NM*
- 01/11/2009 09:19:09 PM
456 Views
Re: I'm 99% sure that was Mesaana. (Sheriam stated specifically that it wasn't Halima)
- 01/11/2009 10:44:07 PM
913 Views
