Active Users:810 Time:03/05/2026 09:14:30 PM
I can't follow your logic PatAtt Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
According to Brandon, at the most, Rand could burn somebody out of the pattern a full week back. That's using the Choedan Kal, etc. Because Asmodean died more than a week ago (it was something like 6 months ago in Randland time) then Graendal could not have been Asmo's killer.

If it is true that Graendal died by balefire, then she did not kill Asmodean, end of story.


What Brandon is saying is that no matter how strong you are, you can burn a thread out of the pattern less than 1 week in the past. Since Asmodean died more than a week previously, balefiring his killer cannot bring him back. This is true regardless of who the killer is.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1988 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 924 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 980 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 484 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 969 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 983 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1032 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1008 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 946 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 851 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 825 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 864 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 860 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 860 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 805 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 900 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 852 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 881 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 865 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 829 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 870 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 872 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 888 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 954 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 930 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 884 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 822 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 893 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 926 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 797 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 767 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 827 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 883 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 441 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 920 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 427 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 796 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 856 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 426 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 876 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 793 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 858 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 828 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 843 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 406 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 363 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 844 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 851 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 787 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 828 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 431 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 817 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 393 Views

Reply to Message