Active Users:1584 Time:23/09/2026 09:03:10 AM
I can't follow your logic PatAtt Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
According to Brandon, at the most, Rand could burn somebody out of the pattern a full week back. That's using the Choedan Kal, etc. Because Asmodean died more than a week ago (it was something like 6 months ago in Randland time) then Graendal could not have been Asmo's killer.

If it is true that Graendal died by balefire, then she did not kill Asmodean, end of story.


What Brandon is saying is that no matter how strong you are, you can burn a thread out of the pattern less than 1 week in the past. Since Asmodean died more than a week previously, balefiring his killer cannot bring him back. This is true regardless of who the killer is.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2084 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1019 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1066 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 538 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1068 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1061 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1110 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1088 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1027 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 935 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 899 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 962 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 940 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 946 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 901 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 977 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 927 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 976 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 947 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 921 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 964 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 968 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 981 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1066 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1042 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 970 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 927 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 973 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1013 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 879 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 854 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 908 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 965 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 482 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1006 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 475 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 881 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 933 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 473 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 967 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 885 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 938 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 914 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 935 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 453 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 405 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 938 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 923 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 865 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 913 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 472 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 894 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 442 Views

Reply to Message