Active Users:504 Time:08/11/2026 11:19:22 AM
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
You're assuming two things.

First, that Graendal is in fact dead. She probably is, sure, but this is NOT proven.

Second, that the only people who know the identity of Asmodean's killer are Asmodean himself and the killer. Why can't someone else know? Couldn't we get it from some other POV?

All Sanderson is saying is that IF Graedal were the killer, she can't be balefired so far back that it would bring Asmodean back.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2121 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1057 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1101 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 566 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1108 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1103 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1145 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1122 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1072 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 974 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 933 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 1000 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 978 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 977 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 945 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 1010 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 961 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 1020 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 983 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 961 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 999 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 1009 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 1017 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1098 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1081 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 1006 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 965 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 1010 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1057 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 912 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 898 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 940 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 1003 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 506 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1056 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 497 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 919 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 970 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 493 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 999 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 922 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 972 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 951 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 969 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 479 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 425 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 979 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 961 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 899 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 946 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 493 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 926 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 462 Views

Reply to Message